The Wandering Skeptic
Saturday, January 08, 2005
  What Dostoyevsky could not forsee in the relation of mathematical reason to capriciousness is that one day science would avail itself of its apparent stolid regimentation. That is what quantum physics revels in: the discovery of randomness as the essence of the physical world; that what we can never measure because of Heisenberg, because of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen: that is what gives true awe to what we sense. Modern physics is not an attempt to explain that randomness -- that quantum flux -- but only attempts to catalog it; not, as it were, to understand its literal truth, but rather to marvel at its creative fury.

Every new quantum equation serves to add a new brushstroke to the oeuvre, to approach with dazzling color an asymptote of comprehension and predictability; and not out of pure aesthetics, to be sure, or even any secular faith, but rather out of satisfaction at the non-rigidity of it all. So science and art can converge not because they are similar, but because the creativity of mankind spurs them both on similar paths, paths which meet at the heart of the human desire to have a chaotic peace of mind. 
Random thoughts and philosophies by Larry Kwong

Name:

I do postdoctoral cancer research at a private university and have a side interest in skepticism, especially where it concerns religion, evolution, and existentialism. I'm also a Bears fan. Go Bears!

Archives
March 2001 / April 2001 / May 2001 / June 2001 / July 2001 / August 2001 / September 2001 / October 2001 / November 2001 / December 2001 / January 2002 / February 2002 / March 2002 / April 2002 / May 2002 / June 2002 / July 2002 / August 2002 / September 2002 / October 2002 / November 2002 / February 2003 / March 2003 / April 2003 / May 2003 / June 2003 / September 2003 / January 2004 / June 2004 / September 2004 / January 2005 / May 2005 / August 2005 / January 2006 / April 2009 / December 2009 /


Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]